[Alumni-chat] What will the BOT do?
Sistersara at aol.com
Sistersara at aol.com
Mon Sep 3 18:52:23 EDT 2007
In a message dated 9/3/2007 3:55:46 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
alumni-chat_forum at antiochians.org writes:
I think you're mistaken about the College's budget being in the black. If
we look at the Record in 1951, we find out that
McGregor was struggling with the need to slash the budget by $250-300k (a
lot in those days) because of a predicted 25-30% drop in enrollment and the
pressures of inflation. As a result, the Record predicted a tuition jump of 10%
in 2 years, and the College abolished its Deans of Men and Women jobs,
replacing them with CG responsibilities and committees. The saving grace for the
College was the GI bill and a whole new market for student recruitment. The
illusion of a "golden era" in which the College enjoyed stability and
financial security is nostalgia at its best. The GI bill and the baby boom
provided the only years of relative solvency.
Bob
Bob, the prediction of a drop in enrollment in 1951 was based on recent
World War II experience. Remember this is the early period of the Korean War,
very large draft calls were in the works, the possibility of war with China was
being discussed, after having removed most of our occupation troops from
Germany, the decision to create NATO resulted in the return of large numbers of
American troops to Germany, Holland, Italy, etc., All this set the stage for
large draft calls, and all colleges were predicting a very large drop in
enrollment as a result. But by the end of 1952 and the beginning of the
Eisenhower era, the predictions of large scale land war decreased as did draft calls,
and colleges stopped being concerned with the issue. By 1953 there was a
whole new cohort of GI's from the Korean War, who had GI benefits, and who used
them to pay for college. When I entered Antioch, the last class of Korean
era GI's were 4th and 5th year students.
To compare you need to compare the costs of Antioch then and now. In 1957
you could attend Antioch on A or B div for about 1200 total, tuition, fees,
room and board. C div was about 1500. The 1200 was about double the cost at
the end of WWII, or about 600. The cost of Antioch pretty much tracked the
increase in the cost of living, and median incomes. If you look at median
family incomes from those periods, you will note that Antioch's costs are well
within the ability of a significant part of the American Middle Class to pay
out of a combination of current income and savings. This is just not the case
with an annual cost of nearly 30 thousand dollars. College and University
education has been made into a commodity that substantially benefits the
Financial Institutions that are subsidized to provide the loan system. It is in
their interest that inflation has created a market for their financial
product. It is really time to comprehend this and understand that it requires high
level political action to change the calculus.
In the post war period, Antioch developed a significant market for its self
among Liberal and Progressive Jews, Quakers and Unitarians. When Dixon
became President in 1959, the Antioch Student body was about one third Jewish, and
the addition of Quakers and Unitarians brought that "liberal religious"
faction of the student body up to over 50%. The attraction of Antioch to Jews
had a great deal to do with the fact that most other selective Liberal Arts
Colleges had a Jewish Quota, and particularly among more Progressive -- or shall
I say Civil Rights Aware Jewish groups, the idea of competing within a small
quota for a place at say Harvard or Amherst or even Oberlin was very
distasteful, but it was an attraction of Antioch. That didn't change till 1966 when
the 1964 Civil Rights Act provisions outlawing Quotas took effect.
Understanding how informal networks can enhance your applicant pool is absolutely
essential for a small college, but I don't think this was well understood in the
aftermath of the late 1960's. It isn't the whole strategy but it is a key
part of it.
I think the commentary on "meaningful" jobs and the cost of living in New
York City is pretty bankrupt. Today is Labor Day -- we celebrate something of
the contribution of the great American Workforce to the country, and it
should be "meaningful" to have an experience out of the college culture as a
fairly short term participant observer in that workforce. Moreover there are
hundreds of communities in the US that have a great deal of interest to offer
that is "meaningful" that are not the Big Apple. Many of these places are not
all that expensive. And as things go, many are fairly safe.
Antioch's problem is that it doesn't have the assets to invest in targeted
job development. It takes staff and a travel budget. Moreover, Antioch
should not be suggesting to incoming students that an Antioch identity suddenly
confers the ability to make a difference. That comes with learned skills, and
most 18-22 year olds don't have all that many skills yet that are highly
valued by employers. The college should be focused on developing the entry level
jobs likely connected with career interests, and then increasing the value
the student can add to the employer's mission job by job. But it also has to
be understood as a partnership between College and Employer -- and from what
I have heard the College these days doesn't have the assets to invest in
working with employers to encourage their role in the educational mission. In
the late 1950's we had 14 PD staff advisors each responsible for about 100
students and about 50 to 60 jobs. Three weeks out of a quarter they traveled,
meeting with employers, developing new jobs and the like -- the rest of the
time they were involved with reading post job papers and reports, and dealing
with the students bids for listed jobs and making placements. It took that
level of support to do it properly.
************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
More information about the Alumni-chat
mailing list