[Alumni-chat] Re: [antioch-nyc] Fwd: today's (sat) letter tofaculty from Bloch

[Laura Fathauer]

The original was filed to be dropped without prejudice, which allows for the
opportunity for a refiling. Mostly due to the original asking for a injunction
on suspension, which is at this point technically no longer an issue.

-l


--- Art Dole <aadole at roadrunner.com> wrote:

> On 11/11/07 5:05 PM, "Stephen L. Wasby" <wasb at albany.edu> wrote:
> 
> > I have tried to stay pretty much on the sidelines, but this message --with
> > which I agree-- prompts these further thoughts:
> > 
> > Keeping the declaration of financial exigency in place, with no indication
> > of when, or under what conditions, it will removed allows the continuation
> > of the termination of tenured faculty, just as the suspension for four
> years
> > would have allowed not returning those people to the faculty of a "revived"
> > college.
> >  
> If the AU-OT continues on its present path, how can they avoid a long,
> draining court battle? What is the current status of the faculty/staff suit
> against AU?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Alumni-chat mailing list
> Alumni-chat at w3.antioch.edu
> http://w3.antioch.edu/mailman/listinfo/alumni-chat
> Visit http://www.Antioch-College.edu today!
> 



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs