[Alumni-chat] Jon Tourtellot, Antioch '67,
ranks World Heritage Sites best-to-worst, for Nat. Geographic Soc.
YAZZ ALLEN
davidallenusa at yahoo.com
Sun Nov 4 19:44:52 EST 2007
Nov. 4, 07
Hi from Yazz (David) Allen '66 (YazzAllen at Yahoo.Com)!
I've been trying to forget about the terms connected with the "re-opening" of Antioch, and was doing reading about the World Heritage Sites proclaimed by the UN starting in 1973 (853 sites worldwide).
I chanced to come upon the name of Antiochian Jon Tourtellot, now a big deal at the National Geographic Society, who is mentioned in the following article about his work ranking the best and worst of the World Heritage Sites.
I thought I'd share the following with others, possibly also trying to forget about how awful the Antioch University Trustees still are, and the fact they still control Antioch, whether or not the school remains open:
-------------------
Best, Worst World Heritage Sites Ranked var bust; if (typeof bust == 'undefined') { bust = Math.floor(1000000*Math.random()); } if ((!document.images & navigator.userAgent.indexOf('Mozilla/2.') >= 0) || navigator.userAgent.indexOf("WebTV")>= 0) { document.write(''); document.write(''); } else { document.write(''); document.write(''); document.write(''); document.write(''); }
Hope Hamashige
for National Geographic News
November 15, 2006
The National Geographic Society's Center for Sustainable Destinations has released a scorecard ranking the world's top natural and cultural treasures.
Jonathan Tourtellot, Antioch '67, also a grad of the Philips Exeter Academy before attending Antioch College in the 60's, geotourism editor of National Geographic Traveler magazine, spearheaded the survey, which solicited findings from more than 400 experts in sustainable tourism on nearly a hundred UN World Heritage sites. The United Nations began naming World Heritage sites in 1973 to help preserve grand palaces like France's Versailles, remnants of ancient civilizations such as Peru's Machu Picchu, and natural wonders like Australia's Great Barrier Reef, Tourtellot explains. But over the years some of the sites have struggled to maintain the unique character that landed them on the list, due to funding shortfalls, heavy tourist traffic, or political strife. To assess how those locations are faring in the 21st century, Tourtellot asked experts to assess 94 of the 830 officially designated sites. The highest scorers have one thing in common,
Tourtellot says: a local community committed to preserving its priceless landmark. "Some places have very heavy tourist traffic and still score welllike the Alhambra [in Spain]," Tourtellot noted. "Among those that scored well, you find the people argue a lot about character-of-place issues, and those arguments can be very constructive."
The results of the survey appear in the November/December 2006 issue of National Geographic Traveler magazine.
Spain's 14th century Moorish palace, the Alhambra, earned the second highest score, behind Norway's West Fjords near the coastal town of Ålesund.
The survey's panelists, whose comments were submitted anonymously, noted that the Alhambra is faring well because the community that hosts itthe town of Granadahas resisted commercializing its top tourist attraction. Wrote one panelist: "Redevelopment of the city over the past 20 years has been broadly sympathetic to the ancient Moorish core, and although the number of outlets catering [to the] tourist trade has increased noticeably, the city does retain a coherent Andalusian character." Even the rural destinations topping the list, such as the remote parks and gateway towns that make up New Zealand's Te Wahipounamu region, benefit when the local community feels it has a stake in the site, the panelists agreed. Of the coastal destination on New Zealand's South Island, one panelist noted: "There is no issue with local people not protecting it; they are all active protectors. All tourists need reminding that they are entering an exceptional place, that it
is a privilege to be there." Mexico's colonial city of Guanajuato was the fifth on the list and was the most improved destination since the Center for Sustainable Destinations conducted its last survey in 2004. In spite of development, the city has worked to preserve its local color, the experts said. One panelist noted that the streets have been repaved in recent years in a traditional fashion. Panelists also praised the hotels, which are largely old, rehabilitated buildings in the city center. Faring Poorly The bottom scorers highlight the host of problems that some sites have yet to tackle, ranging from environmental damage to political trouble, the experts said. The Potala Palace in Tibet earned the fourth worst score, because while it remains an architectural gem, the city of Lhasa has lost its cultural integrity as a result of Chinese efforts to eradicate Tibetan culture, the panelists said. Meanwhile, the Spanish colonial ruins at
Portobelo/San Lorenzo in Panama, the second worst scorer, have degraded under the pressures of overbuilding and deforestation in the surrounding national park. Nepal's Kathmandu Valley came in dead last for the dense air pollution and modern construction that surrounds many ancient temples there. But Ecuador's Galápagos Islands, which earned the third lowest score, experienced the biggest drop-off of any site since the 2004 survey. Panelists said that although the Galápagos maintain 95 percent of their native species, invasive species of plants and animals pose a serious threat to the islands. Johannah Barry, president of the Virginia-based nonprofit Galápagos Conservancy, said new residents in the Galápagos are bringing domestic animals and plants to the fragile island ecosystem. "Introductions become problematic because the species here have evolved in isolation, and so they don't have a lot of defenses," Barry said. Likewise, she notes,
nonnative insects have hitched rides with tourists on boats to the islands, and many of the bugs have established themselves as a threat to native species.
New efforts to enforce quarantines and inspections of tourist boats are in place, Barry added, but the programs are "not terribly well funded."
----
Contact "Yazz" (David) Allen directly via email at YazzAllen at Yahoo.Com, mail to 644 Shrewsbury Commons Ave., #239, Shrewsbury PA USA 17361...phone (717) 235 - 1982!
See my movie actor photos and recent credits at WWW.IMDb.Com (world's largest movie info database, owned by Amazon.Com) IMDb RESUME. Also WWW.SAG.Org "IActor, "WWW.CastingNetworks.Com.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the Alumni-chat
mailing list